Tag: D-Crit

The People’s City

Imagine the city as a space for borrowing instead of buying, says architecture studio MOTOElastico in their book “Borrowed City”. | MOTOElastico
Imagine the city as a space for borrowing instead of buying, says architecture studio MOTOElastico in their book “Borrowed City”. | MOTOElastico

The city is often portrayed as a playground for the rich and powerful: the real estate developer, the urban planner, the starchitect. From their point-of-view (often high up in skyscrapers), ordinary city inhabitants look nothing more than specks amidst the glitzy urban skyline.

Two recent books from Asia take us down to the streets of the city instead. Both publications are fascinating collections of hyper-local vernacular designs that demonstrate how two Asian cities are built from the ground-up.

For the cover of “Borrowed City”, graphic designer Fritz K. Park reappropriated the visual language of the yellow-and-black striped street barricades commonly found in Seoul.
For the cover of “Borrowed City”, graphic designer Fritz K. Park reappropriated the visual language of the yellow-and-black striped street barricades commonly found in Seoul.

 

Borrowed City (2013) is a tour through Seoul by MOTOElastico. The architecture studio has been documenting how private citizens use public space for their personal benefit in the capital since 2009. Turning sidewalks into stores with just a few baskets of goods, planting vegetables along public staircases, or ‘parking’ on the roadside to have a picnic lunch — these are just some of the book’s examples of how citizens have built their own spaces in the city; each intervention is photographed and enhanced with 3-D models. By reading such acts as “borrowing” as opposed to “buying” the city, the studio (headed by Italians Marco Bruno and Simone Carena) makes a case for how the considerate use of public spaces by citizens can help build a more participatory and inclusive city.

Siu King-chung’s lesser designs (2013) showcases similar projects from Hong Kong. Inspired by 19th century English designer and critic William Morris’s idea of the “Lesser Arts”, Siu created a book that celebrates the design wisdom of ordinary citizens. Beginning with a typical Hong Kong home and ending out on the city’s colourful neon-lit streets, the associate professor at the city’s PolyU Design points out the variety of anonymous designs in everyday life through photographs. The simple Chinese and English captions prove how design and creativity are not exclusively for professionals — “Lesser designs” for Siu are not lousier, just less obvious.

What makes both books particularly precious is that they offer another view of city life — one that is often transient and threatened by rapid urban development. Whether it is in Seoul, Hong Kong or any of the growing cities in Asia, “modern” solutions are increasingly introduced with the promise of order, efficiency, and a better living environment. But by re-framing seemingly chaotic street life through smart citizen interventions, both books offer a more humanistic reading of city living that begs a closer look.

———–
Written for Elizabeth Spiers and Chappell Elison’s Online Publishing class at D-Crit.

Design: A Creative Process of Copying

Braun’s T3 Transistor Radio (1958) and the original iPod (2001) | LIFE EDITED
Braun’s T3 Transistor Radio (1958) and the original iPod (2001) | LIFE EDITED

Renowned Japanese fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto is all for copying.

Asked to reflect on his clothes being referenced by younger designers as part of fashion history, he said:

“I would like to shout to young people, especially young designer or young student. Simply, be yourself, you’re okay. And start copying which you love. Copy, copy, copy, copy, and end of the copy you will find yourself.”

This idea of seeking originality through the process of copying is controversial given a designer’s aim to be unique. No one likes to admit being a copycat, but the truth is design travels through iterations rather than discrete moments of entirely new inventions.

Invite-Mailer-Fix1

Copies: Creative Processes Transformation and Evolution” is an on-going exhibition in Mexico City’s Archivo Diseño y Arquitectura that looks specifically at design copies. Beginning from Archivo’s own collection of design objects, guest curators Cecilia León de la Barra and Jorge Gardoni found “copies” of them to put together side-by-side for comparison. From designer furniture to popular salt-and-pepper shakers, the duo found that lookalikes existed for all kind of things.

And it wasn’t just small shady companies making copies. In their exhibition, they’ve highlighted how Apple’s popular iPod and Calculator app makes references to Dieter Rams’ industrial design from Braun.

Despite the exercise, they came none the wiser about differentiating between a copy from an original.

“We think it’s difficult to identify real originals, most of them are all evolutions or transformations,” said the duo over an e-mail interview. “Sometimes it was just a matter of which came first, or coincidences.”

A selection of IKEA furniture and their competitor’s lookalikes from website E-Kit 2.0

Ultimately, the difference for them is all down to the designer’s intention. While they avoided featuring designers or companies that “plagarised” just to make money, they wanted to acknowledge how copying is part of every creative process. It helps a designer better understand how something works so that they can go on to create something “new.”

A more fuzzy word that designers use is “inspiration”, which has a more noble ring than the blunt idea of copying. Either way, it is a tacit acknowledgement that design does not exist in a vacuum, but is only a time-specific physical manifestation of a larger journey through ideas.

———–
Written for Elizabeth Spiers and Chappell Elison’s Online Publishing class at D-Crit.

In Search of Provenance

"Provenance" at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
“Provenance” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Watching the furniture restorer tear apart a Pierre Jeanneret chair to nothing more than its wooden skeletal frame, I was left with the question of what is an original design. That this eventually restored chair was auctioned off for tens of thousands of dollars as a collector’s item only made it more perplexing.

This hyper-inflation of mid-century modernist furniture is the subject of Amie Siegel’s “Provenance” (2013), a haunting 40-minute film that traces backwards the origins of a series of furniture designed by Swiss architect Jeanneret in the 1950s. Beginning from wealthy, stylish homes in the West where many of these furniture pieces now reside, Siegel takes us through the auction houses, furniture restorers, a cargo ship, and finally ends up in Chandigarh, the Indian city in which Jeanneret first conceived these utilitarian furniture for use in the modernist government buildings by his cousin, Le Corbusier. Amidst the now decaying buildings, we see these much sought after furniture pieces still being used as office furniture or even strewn in corners forgotten as they have been replaced by the generic wares of modern cubicle life.

Siegel’s cinematic journey — lingering tracking shots and without any dialogue — reveals the construction of “value” in such furniture today. Taken out of their original context, restored, glamorously photographed, and finally paraded at auction houses, these pieces of design are bestowed an aura of legitimacy and originality by what has become an industrial performance. Though beautifully shot, the film unveils an ugly truth: what do people really value in these pieces? The distance it has traveled? The restoration efforts? The myth of its origins?

ProvenanceClips

A separate journey to uncover the source of a design by Thomas Thwaites for The Toaster Project (2008), however, travels an entirely different route. The proposal is equally simple: to build a cheap chain-store toaster, costing just £3.49, from scratch — starting from acquiring the necessary raw materials. It turns out be both frustrating and hilarious, and the distance an individual in London has to travel to replicate what has essentially become a global industrial process today shows the hidden gap between a designed product and the world we live in. While Thwaites succeeds in building a barely functioning toaster eventually, it costs him £1187.54 and looks like a complete meltdown — all signs of the unseen external costs and environmental consequences created by the production of cheap consumer products.

DANIEL ALEXANDER
The toaster built by Thwaite. | DANIEL ALEXANDER

Despite the huge disparity in value between Jeanneret’s restored furniture and the chain-store toaster, they are but two endpoints on a continuum of the capitalistic global economy. Both have been designed for profit, but how they attain it differs. While auction houses play on scarcity and the original myth, big-chain stores flood the market with anonymous and cheap products. By traveling to the sources of these products, we open up what is often presented as complete and closed so as to take a critical look at the larger forces that shape and give form to these things we so easily call ‘designed’.