Category: Design

Eulindra Lim: The Rise of the Women in Singapore Design

In 1966, the advertising industry in Singapore and Malaysia recognized the “Best Asian Designer” for the first time—the prize given by the Creative Circle, an annual award show organized by the advertising agencies in the two neighboring countries. This honor was presented to Miss Eulindra Lim. An art director at S.H. Benson—a British advertising agency that was one of the largest in the two former colonies—Eulindra was recognized to have distinguished herself among the local advertising workforce of primarily Chinese, Malays, and Indians. They worked in agencies traditionally owned and led by white expatriates from Australia and the United Kingdom, a legacy of how the advertising industry in Singapore and Malaysia had developed with colonial industrialization.

However, both colonies had become independent nations by 1966. The Creative Circle was established four years earlier to elevate local creative standards and ultimately nurture “top creative people to originate and lead in this field—in their own country.” While the award initially recognized only the best work in various categories each year, the addition of the “Best Asian Designer” prize from its fourth edition sought to spotlight local talents and attract more of them into the industry.

Mr. Peter Morgan-Harry, the managing director of S.H. Benson, said about Eulindra’s achievement: “As a career, any serious-minded young man or woman joining the business at the moment can look forward to a very bright and successful career. There is every prospect of the expenditure on advertising rising rapidly during the next ten years.”

Besides an effort to localize, Eulindra’s win could also be read as the rise of women in Singapore’s advertising industry. In 1966, barely a quarter of the country’s economically active population of over 576,600 was female, and the majority were employed in the community, social and personal services. The advertising industry was no exception, having been long been “exclusively a man’s world” where women were thought to be not as capable as men. This began changing from the 1960s, when an estimated 100 females “held coveted executive positions.” In the 1970s, Eulindra  joined their ranks when she started her design studio, Eulindra Designs, which worked on several significant projects that supported Singapore’s modernization into a global city-state. The studio’s success encouraged the rise of other female-led creative agencies that have become a part of Singapore’s creative community today.

➜ Read the full essay in Women Graphic Designers: Rebalancing the Canon

A “Singa­pore Design” Myth: How a Dragon Playground Went from Near Extinction to a National Icon

The Year of the Dragon in 2024 saw dragons pop up across Singapore. Some lined the streets of Chinatown and took centre stage in festivities. Others starred in advertisements and even popped up inside shopping malls. The creature representing last year’s Chinese zodiac was embraced by businesses and organisations as part of the traditional Lunar New Year celebrations.

While there were many different versions of the dragon, one design stood out: a geometric rendition with mosaic-like skin and an octagonal eye, popularly known among locals as the “dragon playground”. It was nowhere in sight during the last Year of the Dragon but appeared everywhere 12 years later. The recent popularity of the design was even more curious considering it is based on a playground that was first introduced in Singapore over forty years ago. Several were built along with new public housing estates in the 1970s and 1980s, but almost all were demolished by the early 2000s. In fact, only four examples of the dragon playground from that period still stand today.

How did a nearly extinct design return some two decades later to become a popular national icon? This revival reflects the expanded role of design in Singapore since the 2000s. As the country began developing a creative economy, design was recognised more than just a tool for industrialisation, but one that can also shape culture and represent national identity. The story of the dragon playground demonstrates how ideas of nationhood are neither inherent in a design nor solely inscribed by the designer. Instead, “Singapore design” is an ongoing construction that evolves alongside changing ideas of the nation in the country.

➜ Read the full essay in Issue #1 of the SAM Design Collection Journal

Critical of / for what?

This project embarks on an investigation of what it means to teach, learn, and practice criticality in design. Set against the backdrop of a neoliberal economic system and an industry constantly disrupted by emerging technologies, it takes a deep dive into the tension between education and professional practice. It examines how design, as a field increasingly seen as crucial to navigating the future, is being redefined—and whether “criticality” is being nurtured or neglected along the way.

Prior to the Fellowship, initiators Candice Ng, Justin Zhuang and Vanessa Ban had conducted interviews with 12 local educators and designers on this topic. The Fellowship supported the organisation of an invite-only panel discussion, hosted at the SAM residency spaces, to further explore the role of criticality in Singapore design practices and how it is taught in local design schools. The primary goal of the event was to foster dialogue between industry and academia and encourage a shared understanding and vocabulary to advance the teaching, learning and practice of criticality within contemporary design practice.

➜ Read more about the project at the SAM Design Collection website